Transform promising AI ideas into funded projects. Learn the proven framework for building business cases that address executive concerns, quantify value, and secure resources.
Most AI proposals fail not because the technology isn't promising, but because the business case doesn't address decision-maker concerns.
Focuses on AI capabilities ('Our chatbot uses GPT-4!') instead of business problems solved and outcomes achieved.
'Improve efficiency' and 'enhance customer experience' are meaningless without specific, measurable targets and financial quantification.
Underestimates change management, data preparation, integration complexity, and organizational resistance to adoption.
Doesn't address 'What if it doesn't work?' concerns. No contingency plans, pilot validation, or phase-gate approach.
Successful AI business cases answer five critical questions: (1) What specific business problem does this solve? (2) How much is that problem costing us today? (3) What measurable improvement will AI deliver? (4) What's the total investment and risk? (5) Why is now the right time to act?
This guide provides the framework to answer each question with evidence that executives trust.
Every element executives need to make confident funding decisions.
The only section most executives will read fully. Must stand alone and compel action.
"Our customer service team handles 15,000 support tickets monthly. 62% are repetitive questions that AI could resolve instantly, yet we staff 18 FTEs at $900K annually. Deploying an AI support assistant will reduce ticket volume 50%, save $450K/year in labor costs, and improve response time from 4 hours to under 1 minute—increasing CSAT 15 points. Investment: $180K over 6 months. ROI: 250% in year 1. We recommend approving a $45K pilot to validate 50% deflection rate before full deployment."
Establish why this problem demands attention now. Connect to strategic priorities.
Describe WHAT you'll build and HOW you'll build it—in business terms, not tech jargon.
The most critical section. Quantify financial impact with conservative assumptions.
Complete cost breakdown and ROI calculation over 3-year horizon.
Address the elephant in the room: What if it doesn't work? Show you've thought through failure modes.
Propose phase-gate approach: Small pilot → Validate assumptions → Scale gradually. Define go/no-go criteria for each phase. This shows you'll validate before committing full budget and gives executives confidence to approve phase 1.
Concrete timeline, milestones, team structure, and measurement plan.
Start with 'We can save $2M annually by reducing customer churn 15%' not 'We want to implement a machine learning model.' Executives care about outcomes, not algorithms.
Reference successful AI deployments in your industry or by competitors. 'Company X achieved 3x ROI with similar AI implementation' reduces perceived risk.
Acknowledge concerns proactively: 'I know our past analytics projects took longer than expected. Here's why this is different...' Shows you're realistic, not selling vaporware.
Ask for pilot approval, not full project. 'Approve $50K to validate assumptions in 8 weeks' is easier than 'Approve $500K for 18-month project.' Build trust incrementally.
Get a C-level champion who understands the business case to co-present. Their credibility transfers to your proposal. Prep them thoroughly on likely questions.
Executive summary: 1 page. Full business case: 8-12 pages maximum. Appendices (technical details, detailed calculations): unlimited but separate. Most executives will only read the executive summary, so it must be completely self-contained. Technical stakeholders will review full document. Keep it concise—you can elaborate verbally during presentation.
Yes, strategically. If competitors have deployed similar AI successfully, cite it as proof of concept and urgency ('We risk falling behind'). If you're ahead, position as competitive differentiator ('First-mover advantage'). Avoid fear-mongering ('Competitors will destroy us with AI')—it undermines credibility. Focus on your specific business rationale.
Some AI projects (e.g., AI safety, governance infrastructure, capability building) enable future value rather than deliver immediate ROI. For these, frame as 'option value'—the investment creates ability to pursue future opportunities or avoid future risks. Quantify the cost of NOT having the capability when you need it. Compare to similar strategic investments (e.g., upgrading ERP systems).
Compare total cost of ownership: AI cost vs. equivalent labor cost over 3 years. Include: (1) Fully-loaded employee cost (salary + benefits + overhead), (2) Scalability constraints (labor doesn't scale linearly with volume), (3) Quality consistency (AI doesn't have bad days), (4) Speed (AI processes thousands of cases vs. dozens). Usually AI is 60-80% cheaper at scale with better quality.
Be honest: no AI project has guaranteed ROI. Instead, offer: (1) Conservative estimates with safety margin, (2) Pilot phase to validate assumptions before full investment, (3) Phase-gate approach with go/no-go decision points, (4) Reference cases from similar implementations, (5) Money-back guarantee from vendors if using external partners. Frame as 'managed risk' not 'risk-free'—executives respect realism.
Our team has developed 200+ winning AI business cases across industries. We'll help you quantify benefits, address executive concerns, and secure funding.
Or call us at +46 73 992 5951